Academic Insights
Eye 2 focuses on the practitioner’s choice and application of interventions during mediation. In supervision, this lens encourages reflection on what strategies were used, why they were chosen, and how effective they were in supporting constructive communication and resolution.
Intentionality and Adaptability
Research shows that interventions such as reframing, summarising, and reality testing are most effective when used with timing and sensitivity (Fisher & Ury, 2011). Rigid or habitual use reduces effectiveness and can make clients feel unheard (Kolb & Putnam, 1992).
Supervisor’s role: Prompt mediators to reflect on why they chose a strategy, how they monitored its impact, and whether they adjusted in response to party reactions.
Ethical Alignment
All interventions must align with FDR regulations and AMDRAS standards, upholding confidentiality, impartiality, and client autonomy. Poorly chosen interventions can unintentionally escalate power imbalances or create perceptions of bias.
Supervisor’s role: Guide supervisees to evaluate whether their interventions supported fairness and child-focused practice, and to reflect on what adjustments were needed to maintain neutrality.
Creativity and Non-Verbal Communication
Eye 2 also highlights the subtle impact of silence, body language, and tone. These often influence dialogue as much as formal techniques. Creativity and flexibility allow mediators to adapt interventions to context while still maintaining structure and safety.
Supervisor’s role: Encourage mediators to notice not only what they said but also how they showed up — their presence, non-verbal signals, and use of space or silence.
Why This Lens Matters
Practitioners who reflect on their interventions become intentional, ethical, and adaptive professionals. Rather than applying a checklist of techniques, they develop the capacity to create space for meaningful, client-centred dialogue.
Reflective Questions for Supervisors
-
How can you help a mediator reflect on why they chose a particular intervention?
-
In what ways can you explore whether interventions respected client autonomy and impartiality?
-
How might cultural or systemic factors have influenced the choice and timing of interventions?
-
Which interventions helped balance power between parties — and which may have reinforced imbalance?
-
How can you support mediators to use silence and non-verbal communication as constructive interventions?