Module 5 — Page 6 of 41

Lens 1 - Practical Application

Theory becomes most valuable when it is grounded in practice. As a supervisor, you can use real or hypothetical case examples to help supervisees see how Lens 1 applies in Family Dispute Resolution. These scenarios illustrate how cultural, emotional, systemic, and child-focused contexts shape client participation — and how supervisors can guide mediators to recognise and respond to these influences in their work.

Example 1: Cultural Nuances in Communication

Scenario:
A mediator is facilitating a mediation between two parents — one Australian-born and one recently migrated from Japan. During the joint session, the Japanese parent avoids direct eye contact and gives short, polite responses. The mediator interprets this as evasive and disrespectful, unconsciously favouring the other parent who appears more forthcoming. This escalates tension.

Explanation:
Through Lens 1, the supervisor helps the mediator recognise how cultural norms influence communication. In Japanese culture, avoiding direct eye contact can be a sign of respect, not dishonesty. Without this awareness, both the mediator and the other party may misinterpret the behaviour.

Takeaways:

Supervisor Questions to Explore:


Example 2: Trauma-Informed Awareness

Scenario:
In a family mediation, one parent becomes visibly agitated when the other raises their voice. The mediator calls a private session and learns that this parent experienced domestic violence in a previous relationship. Although this was not disclosed during pre-mediation, the history is now shaping their engagement.

Explanation:
Lens 1 prompts supervisors to guide mediators in recognising how trauma affects participation. The mediator’s role is not to diagnose trauma but to respond ethically — slowing the pace, offering private sessions, and adjusting processes to prioritise safety. Supervisors may also encourage mediators to reflect on how screening and preparation could support safer disclosure.

Takeaways:

Supervisor Questions to Explore:


Example 3: Child-Centred Considerations

Scenario:
In mediation, one parent insists on equal time with the child, despite their long work hours making this impractical. The mediator treats it as a scheduling problem, overlooking that the child’s needs may not be met by rigid 50/50 arrangements.

Explanation:
Lens 1 supports supervisors in reminding mediators that mediation is not just about fairness between parents, but about outcomes that reflect the child’s context and developmental needs. Supervisors help mediators reflect on how child-focused principles should guide their process.

Takeaways:

Supervisor Questions to Explore:


Supervisor Integration Activity

Choose one of the above examples. As a supervisor, practise how you would use it in a supervision session:

  1. Write down three reflective questions you would ask your supervisee.

  2. Identify what learning outcome you would want them to take away.

  3. Consider how you would help them apply this insight in future mediations.